Nice shabbat - Livre d'Or








Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes. * Blogroll * Strange words * More links * Bookies * Microblog * Recent comments * Humans only * Second degree * By topic * Cool posts * Writing * New post

Tags

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



livredor
Nice shabbat
Saturday, 03 November 2007 at 08:17 pm
Tags:

Previous Entry Next Entry


I've had a really lovely shabbat.

I went out to one of BB's Friday night meals yesterday evening. So there was a proper shabbat atmosphere, with good food and good conversation. I went with my Polish neighbour, who is always good company. It must be weird for her, being in a group of people who have loads of assumed nostalgia for Yiddish songs, but the only ones that anyone knows are, at best, songs that were already old-fashioned when she was growing up in the 30s, or most often just parodies or pastiches from film scores. But she's always very nice about it, and has even tried to teach us some actual Yiddish songs that were popular when she was young.

There was a moment when we were chatting about dentistry, and she told this story: during the last few weeks of the Ghetto in Poland, she got all her savings together and paid to have her teeth seen to. Then, when she was in the concentration camp, she was glad she had made that decision, because one of her schoolfriends had such terrible toothache that she ran out in front of the watchtower, pretending to be trying to escape so that the guard would shoot her. Thing is, my neighbour doesn't go on about her war experiences, because she's wise enough to know that if you keep talking about your traumatic past, even though people will be sympathetic in theory, they can't deal with it and you would end up not having a strong social network. But in this sort of situation, it's the only relevant life experience that she could relate to the conversation. I suspect that by her standards that wasn't even a particularly horrific story; there's plenty she doesn't say.

I got home at around 11, and decided to do something I don't normally do, namely deliberately time-shift myself. Getting a chance to talk to compilerbitch in California was a more important priority than getting up at a decent hour this morning. So we had a really nice chat that went on into the small hours from my point of view. That meant that I was awake when the snow started falling, nothing very impressive but the first of the season.

This morning I had a lie-in, and then spent the second half of the morning chatting to the PRI. We seem to get on very well, we've been having lots of really good conversations. Now, people have pointed out to me that I can't go out with someone just because they're interesting to talk to... I think if I worked on that basis I'd go out with half my friends list, though if I narrowed it to people who are interesting to talk to, and also single and attracted to me and not my exes, I would get more realistic numbers. Anyway, whether it works out or not at the moment we're having a very enjoyable time getting to know eachother.

Then I went to the secret Talmud study cabal in the afternoon. I've missed the last several, since they keep being scheduled when I am either out of the country or committed with Progressive stuff. Anyway, it was even more fun than usual; we were discussing the line from Pirke Avot which says that you should avoid too much interaction with women, otherwise you will attract evil and end up in hell. It is difficult to have any kind of rational discussion about that, but in fact we did so. It didn't degenerate into either being sexist or complaining that the Talmudic epigram is sexist (no, duh!), which is what usually happens.

As for j4's meme, I'm doing moderately well. I have spoken to hatam_soferet and lethargic_man and ploni_bat_ploni on the phone, loreid and compilerbitch by Skype, pseudomonas and syllopsium by IM, sent emails to rysmiel and timeplease, and I made up my tenth by sending an ecard to j4 herself. Some of those were more like ongoing conversations than saying specific things, but it's an improvement on my usual over-reliance on LJ.


Whereaboooots: Chez BB, Södermalm, Sweden
Moooood: relaxedrelaxed
Tuuuuune: AW singing "Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv"
Discussion: 7 contributions | Contribute something
Tags:

Previous Entry Next Entry




Contribute something
View all comments chronologically



rysmiel: default
From:rysmiel
Date:November 3rd, 2007 11:42 pm (UTC)
1 hours after journal entry, 07:42 pm (rysmiel's time)
(Link)
people have pointed out to me that I can't go out with someone just because they're interesting to talk to...

They have ?

People can be really strange sometimes.
(Reply to this comment) (Thread)
mummimamma: Blue Mummimamma
From:mummimamma
Date:November 4th, 2007 10:19 am (UTC)
11 hours after journal entry, 12:19 pm (mummimamma's time)
(Link)
I second this!

After all who wants to go out with people that aren't interesting to talk to? Sometimes you get dates, sometimes you get a new friend. And you really can't have too many friends.
(Reply to this comment) (Up thread) (Parent) (Thread)
livredor: Amelie
From:livredor
Date:November 4th, 2007 08:06 pm (UTC)
21 hours after journal entry, 09:06 pm (livredor's time)
(Link)
Oh, I agree entirely. Not being interesting to talk to is pretty much a deal breaker for me. And part of the reason I'm very happy about the way this is developing is that we're definitely making friends. If that happens I almost don't care whether it turns into a relationship or not. I think the point is that interesting conversation (probably) isn't sufficient reason for embarking on a relationship with this guy.
(Reply to this comment) (Up thread) (Parent) (Thread)
livredor: body
From:livredor
Date:November 4th, 2007 08:00 pm (UTC)
21 hours after journal entry, 09:00 pm (livredor's time)
(Link)
I think these people expect me to have something to say about topics like whether I find him sexy. Which I don't know because I don't know him well enough to feel comfortable thinking about him in that way.

I agree that interesting conversation is a very, very good start, but I think I should probably also give consideration to things like whether we have compatible ideas of how a relationship should work. In the past when I got involved with someone purely because I enjoyed talking to him, it didn't work out all that well.
(Reply to this comment) (Up thread) (Parent) (Thread)
rysmiel: vacant and in pensive mood
From:rysmiel
Date:November 12th, 2007 12:46 am (UTC)
8 days after journal entry, November 11th, 2007 08:46 pm (rysmiel's time)
(Link)
Granted; that was unduly glib of me and you have given the response much more thought than it deserved. *smile*

The "knowing someone well enough to feel comfortable thinking in that direction" is interesting for me, because I'm not sure I have the wiring to have the motivation for such thoughts until I already have the "knowing well enough to be comfortable with" in place, though I can find it very uncomfortable if it's not also clear the person is OK with it [ not necessarily interested, just not repulsed; tolerant amusement works fine as a response to my insecurities in this direction. ]
(Reply to this comment) (Up thread) (Parent) (Thread)
mummimamma: default
From:mummimamma
Date:November 4th, 2007 10:19 am (UTC)
11 hours after journal entry, 12:19 pm (mummimamma's time)
(Link)
Talmudic epigrams? What are they?
(Reply to this comment) (Thread)
livredor: words
From:livredor
Date:November 4th, 2007 08:17 pm (UTC)
21 hours after journal entry, 09:17 pm (livredor's time)
(Link)
The Talmud is the major work setting out the foundations of Jewish law, dating from the 2nd to 5th centuries. It also contains just about every other kind of literature you could imagine; it's kind of huge and complicated. There's a chapter in it called Ethics of the Fathers, which is pretty much a collection of epigrams. The page I've linked to has a rather archaic translation, but all the more modern ones I could find with a quick Google are really ideologically suspect.

The passage we were discussing yesterday is this:
Jose ben Jochanan of Jerusalem said, Let thy house be opened wide; and let the needy be thy household; and prolong not converse with woman. (His own wife, they meant, much less his neighbour's wife.) Hence the wise have said, Each time that the man prolongs converse with the woman he causes evil to himself, and desists from words of Thorah, and in the end he inherits Gehinnom
(Reply to this comment) (Up thread) (Parent) (Thread)



Contribute something
View all comments chronologically