Throwing money at problems - Livre d'Or








Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes. * Blogroll * Strange words * More links * Bookies * Microblog * Recent comments * Humans only * Second degree * By topic * Cool posts * Writing * New post

Tags

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



livredor
Throwing money at problems
Tuesday, 24 January 2017 at 09:22 pm
Tags:

Previous Entry Next Entry


Thank you all so much for all the supportive comments on my post with squee about the awesome bar mitzvah. I feel really loved!

In another instance of my students being brilliant, I ran a session recently to introduce the first year medics to the concept of public health. We ended with an exercise which I found rather fun, so I thought I'd offer it to you to play:

A philanthropist is offering a grant of £250,000 to someone who can propose a way to improve the situation in a deprived housing estate. Population ~10K, annual healthcare spend roughly £100 million. The philanthropist wants to see improvements on a 30 year timescale, and wants the actual inhabitants to be involved in the project in a community building sort of way. What would you do?

I divided my students into two groups and got them to pitch their ideas to me. And I was impressed at how they came out with completely opposite solutions. One group wanted to run a really small-scale educational programme to help schoolkids and their parents to learn about healthy eating, calculating that £250K over 30 years amounts to about £8000 per year and trying to keep within that budget. The other group suggested using the money as seed funding to attract new businesses to the area, aiming to create jobs and increase the tax income so that local facilities could be improved. I think both of those ideas are somewhat unrealistic, but this is a bunch of mostly teenagers, and I really liked both the group who thought about just how far a quarter of a million will (won't) stretch when you're dealing with entrenched social problems, and their colleagues who thought about dealing with some of the root causes of poverty and deprivation.

I prefer comments at Dreamwidth. There are currently comment count unavailable comments there. You can use your LJ address as an OpenID, or just write your name.


Whereaboooots: Keele University, Staffordshire, England
Moooood: curiouscurious
Tuuuuune: Plain White T's: Hey there Delilah
Discussion: 3 contributions | Contribute something
Tags:

Previous Entry Next Entry




Contribute something
View all comments chronologically



(no subject) - miriammoules (1/24/17 09:46 pm)
cartesiandaemon: default
From:cartesiandaemon
Date:January 24th, 2017 11:11 pm (UTC)
1 hours after journal entry
(Link)
Yeah, both those ideas are not complete, but sound like pretty good attempts to me. It's really good to have people thinking about that sort of question now.
(Reply to this comment) (Thread)
vyvyan: default
From:vyvyan
Date:January 25th, 2017 11:43 pm (UTC)
1 days after journal entry, January 26th, 2017 12:43 am (vyvyan's time)
(Link)
I think I would ask local social workers, community group leaders, care workers, GPs and nurses what they thought would be most useful and do that.
(Reply to this comment) (Thread)



Contribute something
View all comments chronologically