Book: The forever war - Livre d'Or — LiveJournal

Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes. * Blogroll * Strange words * More links * Bookies * Microblog * Recent comments * Humans only * Second degree * By topic * Cool posts * Writing * New post


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Book: The forever war
Wednesday, 22 November 2006 at 09:41 pm

Previous Entry Next Entry

Author: Joe Haldeman

Details: (c) 1974 Joe W Haldeman; Pub Del Rey 1981; ISBN 0-345-30148-X

Verdict: The forever war is original but flawed.

Reasons for reading it: It was included in that significant SF books list and that reminded me that I had a copy waiting to be read.

How it came into my hands: rysmiel picked it out when I was book shopping in Montreal last year.

The premises of The forever war seem extremely unlikely to me, but it is an interesting and exciting exploration of those premises. There's a lot of detail of military stuff, but it's sensitively done so it doesn't overwhelm the story, or worse, expect the reader to get off on it. And it manages to keep up the pace, something which is difficult in a plot structure which is basically a series of scences where the hero nearly dies in increasing horrifically battles. It's military fiction which is exciting without being glorifying, and it's thinking about the consequences of the war in space trope without just transplanting a twentieth century war into stage scenery space. I'm fairly certain it's making a point about the Vietnam war, but it's doing so relatively subtly.

The style is very standard old-fashioned hard SF, with a lot of exposition, and a lot of our geeky hero saving the day using physics and lateral thinking. It's a masculine book, but not to the point where it's unreadably annoying. The depictions of various dystopian futures are not startlingly amazing but they make a good counterpoint to the intergalactic war sections of the book, and they're not badly executed.

My main criticisms of tFW are that it has a really bizarre attitude to both sex and gender. And there's a possible reading which isn't descipably homophobic, but it's not the most obvious one. Plus, the ending is incredibly saccharine and totally implausible given the build-up earlier in the book. Basically, its only going to be interesting to people who are deeply into traditional SF, but it's not a bad example of such.

Whereaboooots: space
Moooood: contentcontent
Tuuuuune: Capercaillie: Four stone walls
Discussion: 4 contributions | Contribute something

Previous Entry Next Entry

Contribute something
View all comments chronologically

redbird: books
Date:December 2nd, 2006 08:49 pm (UTC)
5 minutes after journal entry, 04:49 pm (redbird's time)
My understanding is that it's a comment on both the Vietnam War and Robert Heinlein's Starship Troopers.
(Reply to this comment) (Thread)
Date:December 2nd, 2006 11:21 pm (UTC)
2 hours after journal entry
Heh. Robert Heinlein wrote Star Ship Troopers? Well, what did I know? :-)
(Reply to this comment) (Up thread) (Parent) (Thread)
pw201: boobies
Date:December 3rd, 2006 01:59 pm (UTC)
17 hours after journal entry, 02:59 pm (pw201's time)
The book is quite different from the film, though. Fewer co-ed shower scenes, for example.
(Reply to this comment) (Up thread) (Parent) (Thread)
camomiletea: default
Date:December 3rd, 2006 04:36 pm (UTC)
19 hours after journal entry, 12:36 pm (camomiletea's time)
That sounds like something I'd like. And actually this book has been on my wishlist for a few months.
(Reply to this comment) (Thread)

Contribute something
View all comments chronologically