Genre - Livre d'Or








Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes. * Blogroll * Strange words * More links * Bookies * Microblog * Recent comments * Humans only * Second degree * By topic * Cool posts * Writing * New post

Tags

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



livredor
Genre
Thursday, 09 June 2005 at 12:23 pm
Tags:

Previous Entry Next Entry


This is sort of a meme (well, in the pedantic sense, obviously it's a meme, but setting that aside). Lots of people have been talking about converting people to a new reading genre. The first example I saw was chez misia; she got over 300 comments but then she has a huge friends list. Other relevant bits: rho requests out-of-genre recs; shreena asks why people read SF/F. There's a relevant Making Light post too but it's from ages ago, and I have it bookmarked at work not here and I'm never going to find it in the archives by looking for 'book' or 'science fiction'!

So my take on it is this: Please assume for the purposes of these questions that mainstream counts as a genre. Otherwise there are going to be too many branching alternatives and it'll get annoying. Also, this is the kind of meme that makes sense as a post in your journal as much as a comment to this post; I'd love a comment with a link, but a long comment here is fine too.

I'm not much of a genre reader. I read anything that meets the basic criterion of well-written, and I'll read even bad books for the sheer pleasure of reading. Because I read primarily for character, I tend to go for mainstream, where there is nothing else to get in the way.

I also prefer, if I'm to express a preference, mainstream because a lot of genre (any genre) is self-referential. If you haven't read the major influential works, and if you don't know the conventions of the genre, you get a lot less out of it. I'm not saying that mainstream literature is without conventions, but they're conventions that are known to just about anybody who's ever done any reading.

I suppose if I have a preferred sub-genre within mainstream, it's the set of books that fall somewhere in between popular bestsellers and excessively pretentious stuff. I'm not sure if there's a word for semi-intellectual books; I know what I mean by it, they form a distinct group in my mind, but I don't know if they're classified as a group. I like something that challenges me and gives me something to think about, but I like books to have a story and not to be too much effort to read. Reading is something I do to relax, and if I want real intellectual stimulation I'll read scientific papers rather than overblown literary works.

Books I would recommend that seem to me to fall into this sub-genre: AS Byatt, either Possession or Babel Tower. The former I'd recommend to someone who reads romances or bestsellers, who wants to move towards something more high-brow, and the latter to an SF/F reader who wants to try mainstream.

Anne Michaels: Fugitive pieces. Particularly to a reader of poetry or very lush fantasy. It's really gorgeously written, but it's also a story about people and relationships and so on. It's a book I often give to people as a gift, the kind of people I want to give pretty things to more than the kind of people I want to have intense discussions about books with (some of them are the same people, mind you!)

E Annie Proulx: The shipping news. One of those books that's particularly strong on characterization, but the prose is really lovely without ever being florid, and the setting is realist but very unusual, not the kind of thing that's part of my everyday experience.

Zadie Smith: White Teeth. Gloriously readable, but also throws punches and has a hugely tangled and complex structure. In many ways I think Smith is the direct successor to Dickens. She rambles a bit, she does have a bit of a social message, she tends to go in for enormous casts and perhaps too many journalist-like observational sketches as a source of humour, but like Dickens she does all these things very well. I'd recommend it to people who mainly read magazines or popular non-fiction rather than novels.

Today is the 46th day, making 6 complete weeks and 4 days of the Omer.


Moooood: cheerfulcheerful
Tuuuuune: The Clash: London Calling
Discussion: 1 contribution | Contribute something
Tags:

Previous Entry Next Entry




Contribute something
View all comments chronologically



chickenfeet2003: thesee
From:chickenfeet2003
Date:June 9th, 2005 12:38 pm (UTC)
39 minutes after journal entry, 07:38 am (chickenfeet2003's time)
(Link)
We seem to have somewhat similar responses

http://www.livejournal.com/users/chickenfeet2003/360263.html
(Reply to this comment) (Thread)



Contribute something
View all comments chronologically